Somebody explain how this works please: the President and his cabinet lie over and over again to drum up support for a war that we have no business fighting. Our own intelligence agencies tone down the potential threat of this enemy, stating that he does not pose a threat to our nation or national interests unless provoked. We invade the country anyway, and as it turns out the enemy also did not pose a threat when provoked, because we utterly destroy the government and army of that nation within the course of weeks.
Then, as more and more leaks and lies become exposed, blame is shifted from its rightful place on the corrupt, destructive administration of George Bush to the intelligence agency that said from the beginning that Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to America or American interests.
BBC News: CIA 'exaggerated case for war'
Reuters: U.S. Senate intelligence leaders at odds on Iraq
Washinton Times: CIA rejects Senate criticism on Iraq threat
Boston Globe/Contra Costa: CIA refutes Senate prewar-intel report
How can anyone support this small-minded little traitor?
Phaedrus
Then, as more and more leaks and lies become exposed, blame is shifted from its rightful place on the corrupt, destructive administration of George Bush to the intelligence agency that said from the beginning that Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to America or American interests.
BBC News: CIA 'exaggerated case for war'
Reuters: U.S. Senate intelligence leaders at odds on Iraq
Washinton Times: CIA rejects Senate criticism on Iraq threat
Boston Globe/Contra Costa: CIA refutes Senate prewar-intel report
How can anyone support this small-minded little traitor?
Phaedrus